April 5th 2024
The Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act (MHPAEA) aims to ensure your employees have access to mental health and substance use disorder (MH/SUD) benefits at a level that is not more restrictive than the health plan’s coverage of medical/surgical benefits. However, demonstrating compliance, especially around Non-Quantitative Treatment Limitations (NQTLs), can be a significant hurdle. Let’s explore NQTLs, the common obstacles in analyzing them, and how to get the help you need for a successful outcome.
What are NQTLs & Why Do They Matter?
NQTLs are plan restrictions that impact the ability of plan members to access certain types of medical care without a clinical review process. Examples of NQTL’s include inpatient prior authorization, prescription drug step therapy, concurrent care reviews, or provider network restrictions. The Mental Health Parity legislation mandates that NQTLs for MH/SUD benefits cannot be more restrictive than those for comparable medical/surgical benefits. Self-insured employers are required to illustrate parity via a comparative analysis that has been prescribed by the United States Department of Labor (DOL).
The Challenge of Comparative Analysis
The real difficulty lies in proving parity. This requires a detailed comparative analysis – examining how all your NQTLs are adjudicated across both MH/SUD and medical/surgical benefits on both an “as written” and “as applied” basis; many employers stumble here. Recent enforcement data indicates that the DOL has found employer MPHAEA comparative analysis’ to be deficient in illustrating parity for MH/SUD benefits. Self-insured employers must be ready to provide the DOL with a compliant comparative analysis to avoid potential penalties and other enforcement actions. This underscores the complexity of navigating MHPAEA compliance and the need for specialized support.
Navigating the Path to Compliance: Don’t Get Lost in the Maze
While a comparative analysis may seem daunting, there are clear steps you can take to ensure it is completed accurately and efficiently:
The Benefits of Getting It Right: More Than Just Checking a Box
Achieving MHPAEA compliance through a robust NQTL analysis isn’t just about avoiding penalties. Here’s what you gain by getting it right:
Davies Is Your Partner in Compliance
At Davies, we understand the complexities of NQTLs. Our team offers in-depth knowledge and analytical tools to help you conduct a robust comparative analysis. We don’t just help you meet the law; we help create benefit plans that truly serve your people.
Want to learn more about ensuring NQTL parity for your plan? Get in touch with Michael Berman at Michael.Berman@us.davies-group.com.
It has been a while since I last shared on the EPLI environment.…
One of the most common things a new client asks us to help…
Originally published in PEO Insider (August 2021). Reproduced with permission of the National Association of Professional…
The increasing acceptance and adoption of artificial intelligence in the insurance industry promises…
With their deep roots in local communities, farm mutual insurance companies are facing…
Artificial intelligence (AI) and the latest development in technology presents intriguing possibilities for…
Take yourself back to those school days when you sat at the dining…
The Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act (MHPAEA) was designed to legislate…
Catastrophic (CAT) modeling, the process of predicting the financial impact of natural disasters,…